We’re finally beginning to build out our production Kubernetes infrastructure at work, after some extensive testing in dev. Kubernetes relies heavily on TLS for securing communications between all of the components (quite understandably) and while you can disable TLS on many components, obviously once you get to production, you don’t really want to be doing that.

Most of the documentation shows you how to generate a self signed certficate using a CA certificate you create especially for kubernetes. Even Kelsey Hightower’s excellent “Kubernetes the Hard Way” post shows you how to generate the TLS components using a self signed CA. One of the nicest things about using Puppet is that you already have a CA set up and best of all, there’s some really nice APIs inside the puppet master/server meaning provisioning new certs for hosts is relatively straightforward. I really wanted to take advantage of this with our kubernetes setup, so I made sure etcd was using Puppet’s certs:

This works out of the box, because the certs for all 3 etcd hosts have been signed by the same CA.

## Securing Kubernetes with Puppet’s Certs.

I figured it would be easy to use these certs for Kubernetes also. I set the following parameters in the API server config:

but there were a multitude of problems, the main one being that when a pod starts up, it connects to the API using the kubernetes service cluster IP. You can see this in the log messages when starting a pod:

I figured it would be easy enough to fix, I’ll just add a SAN for the puppet cert using the dns_alt_names configuration option. Unfortunately, this didn’t work, and I got the following error message:

Puppet doesn’t have an option to set IP SANS in the SSL certificate, so I had to generate the cert manually and sign it by the Puppet CA. Thankfully, this is fairly straightforward (albeit manual)

## Generating Certs Manually

First, create a Kubernetes config file for OpenSSL on your puppetmaster. I created a directory /var/lib/puppet/ssl/manual_ca to do all this.

Note the two IPs here. The first is the cluster IP from the kubernetes service, you can retrieve it like so:

I also added the actual IP of the kubernetes host for some future proofing. The DNS names have been generated from the Kube DNS config, so also make sure you match that to your kube-dns name.

Next, we need to generate a CSR and a key:

Verify that your CSR has the IP SANS in it:

Now, we need to sign the cert with the Puppet CA:

This will create a cert in certs/kube-api.pem. Now verify it to ensure it looks okay:

We now have the a cert we can use for our kube-apiserver, so we just need to configure kubernetes to use it.

## Configuring Kubernetes to use the certs.

Assuming you’ve copied the certs to your kubernetes master, we now need to configure k8s to use it. First, make sure you have the following config set in the apiserver:

And then configure the controller manager like so:

Restart all the k8s components, and you’re almost set.

## Regenerate service account secrets

The final thing you’ll need to do is delete the service account secrets kubernetes generates on launch. The reason for this is because it use the service-account-private-key-file to generate them, and if you don’t do this you’ll get all manner of permission denied errors when launching pods. It’s easy to do this:

NOTE if you’re already running pods in your kubernetes system, this may affect them and you may want to be careful doing this. YMMV.

From here, you’re using Puppet’s SSL Certs for kubernetes.

So you’ve decided you want to use Configuration Management to control your infrastructure. You’ve read about all of the benefits of “infrastructure as code” and you’ve decided you’re going to Puppet as your chosen configuration management tool.

I personally believe this to be a good choice. When making comparisons between Ansible, Chef and other configuraiton management tools, the true benefit of Puppet over these is the ecosystem that has been established around it to benefit your workflow. The problem with Puppet is getting started. You want to manage a bunch of stuff, but where do you start? How do all these tools fit together? What decisions do you need to make before diving in?

This is a very opinionated set of posts. I’ll try to cover the options, and how I’ve set about doing it, but the main theme here is essentially, getting you off the ground with Puppet.

So if you’ve finished the Puppet learning VM, and you’ve browsed a few modules and think “this is the tool for me!” then open up your desired editor and let’s get cracking!

## Decision Time

Okay, now close your editor. We’re not going anywhere near it yet, because the first thing you need to do is make a few decisions about your infrastructure and what you’ll be managing with Puppet.

There are a lot of components within Puppet that let you manage your infrastructure in a flexible manner, but before you use them you need to know exactly what you want to do with them.

The first thing to think about is how does your infrastructure look at the high level. There are a few things you need to think about:

• Do you have multiple geographic datacenters?
• Do you have multiple deployment environments? (eg. dev, stage, production)
• Do you have multiple infrastructure types? (eg. AWS and physical infrastructure)

The reason you need to think about these things is because it will determine how you use hiera to differentiate between these environments. There will be a full blog post about hiera later, but before you start using it you need to determine how your environment looks. The question you’re looking to answer is how do you logically seperate your infrastructure? Once you have an idea, it’s time to think about your individual hosts.

### Node Classification and Roles

The very next thing you need to thing you need to decide is how you’re going to classify your nodes. Each node in a puppet infrastrucuture has a role or a “thing that it does”. As an example, you might have a database server (with role dbserver) and a web server (webserver). How do you determine that a webserver is a webserver? You might already know it is, but how does your infrastructure know? There are quite a few ways to do this.

• Name based. You might always have the word “web” in the name, in which you can use a regex match
• IP address. Maybe all webservers are in a specific subnet, in which case you might want to match on IP

These two options are both valid, and you can support them within Puppet. If you don’t currently have a classification system, or you want to improve it, you can use an ENC (External Node Classifier). The most popular ones are:

• LDAP
• Foreman
• Something else with a HTTP API

Essentially if you use an ENC, it’ll become your source of true for your roles. This is personally the way I think it should be done, and I highly recommend using foreman. More to come later.

In my last post I wrote about service discover with my Puppetmasters using consul

As part of this deployment, I deployed a healthcheck using Consul’s TCP Checks to check the puppetmasters was responding in its default port (8140). In Puppet, it looked like this:

The problem with this approach is that it’s a dumb check - the puppetmaster runs in a webserver and while the port might be open, what happens if the application is returning a 500 internal server error, for example?

In order to rectify this, I decided to make use of a Puppet HTTP API endpoint to query the status.

I must admit, I didn’t even know that Puppet had a HTTP API until recently. Looking through the docs brought up some gems, but the problem is that by default it’s pretty locked down - and rightly so. It’s a powerful API and a compromised Puppetmaster via API is a dangerous prospect.

Managing this is done via auth.conf and you use the allow directive.

While digging through the API docs, I found a nice status endpoint. However, while querying it, I got a 404 access denied:

This seems easily fixable and extremely useful. In order to make this work, I made a quick change to the auth.conf:

This needs go to above the default policy in auth.conf, which looks like this:

Now, when I try the curl command again, it works!

Sweet, now we can make a proper healthcheck!

Because we set the auth.conf entry to be auth any, it’s straightforward to make a query to the API endpoint. I used the nagios check_http check to get this looking nice. The command looks a bit like this:

Simply, we’re querying localhost on port 8140 and then providing an environment (production is my default environment). The Puppetmaster wants pson, so we send a PSON header, and then we check for the string is_alive. The output looks like this:

This is much, much better than our port check. If we get something other than a 200 OK HTTP code, we’re in trouble.

### Consul

The original point of this post was replacing the consul check of TCP. In Puppet code, that looks like this:

We’ll now get an accurate an reliable healthcheck from our consul check!

I had a problem recently. I’m deploying services, and everything is Puppetized, but I have to manually tell other infrastructure that it exists. It’s frustrating. As an “ops guy” I focus on making my infrastructure services available, resiliant and distributed so that they can scale well and not fail catastrophically. I think we’ve all done this when deploying $things, and most people (in my experience) go through the following stages.. ### Stage 1 - DNS based discovery Everyone has used or is using a poor man’s load balancer somewhere in their infrastructure. DNS is also basically the most basic of service discovery tools, you enter a DNS name and it provides the address of the service! Great! You can also get really fancy and use SRV records for port discovery as well, but then you realise there’s quite a few problems with doing load balancing and service discovery like this: • One of the servers in your infrastructure breaks or goes offline. • The DNS record (either an A record or SRV record) for broken service still exists • Your DNS server, quite rightly, keeps resolving that address for$service because it doesn’t know any better
• Pretty much half of your requests to $service fail (assuming you have two servers for$service)

I know this pain, and I’ve had to deal with an outage like this. In order to fix this problem, I went with stage 2..

### Stage 2 - An actual load balancer

Once you have your service fail once (and it will..) you think you need a better solution, so you look at an actual load balancer, like HAProxy (or in my case, an F5 Big-IP). This has extra goodness, like service availability healthchecks, and will present a single VIP for the service address. You add your service to the load balancing pool, set up a healthcheck and assign a VIP to it, and it will yank out any service provider that isn’t performing as expected (perhaps the TCP port doesn’t respond?) - Voila! You’re not going to have failures for $service now. This is really great for us infrastructure guys, and a lot of people stop there. Their service is now reliable, and all you have to do is set up a DNS record for the VIP and point all your clients to it. Well, this wasn’t good enough for me because everytime I provisioned a new instance of$service, I had to add it to the load balancer pool. Initially we did it manually, and then we got bored and used the API. I was still annoyed though, because I had to keep track of what $service was running where and make sure every instance of it was in the pool. In a land managed by configuration management, this really wasn’t much fun at all. I want to provision a VM for$service, and I want it to identify when it’s ready and start serving traffic automatically, with no manual intervention required.

The straw that broke the camels back for me was spinning up a new Puppetmaster. We might do this rarely, but it should be an automated job - create a new VM and assign it the Puppetmaster role in Puppet, then use a little script on VM startup to add the puppetmaster to the load balancing pool. It worked, but I wanted more.

• Notifications when a puppetmaster failed, so I could fix
• Service availability announcements - when the Puppetmaster was ready, I wanted it to announce its availability to the world and start serving traffic. A script just didn’t feel…right.

This is how I got to stage 3 - with service discovery. Consul, a service discovery tool written by hashicorp was the key.

### Stage 3 - A different way

Before I get started, I must note that there are many other tools in this space. Things like SmartStack and Zookeeper can do things like this for you, but I went with Consul for a few reasons:

• It uses operationally available tools to practice service discovery, like DNS and Nagios Checks
• It’s written in Go (performance, concurrency, language agnostic)
• We use hashicorp tools elsewhere, and they have always proved to be very reliable and well designed.

In order for consul to do its thing, you need to understand a few basic concepts about how it works..

• The best way to implement is to deploy the consul agent to all your service providing infrastructure and clients. The way consul works means that this seems (to me) to be the best implementation.
• The consul agent will form a cluster using the raft consensus protocol
• There are some agents in your infrastructure that operate in “server mode” - these perform consensus checks and elect a leader. You need to decide how many there are in advance, and I suggest an odd number so they can elect a leader.
• Consul uses DNS for service discovery. To do that, it provides a DNS resolver on port 8600.
• The way it decides what to serve on that DNS resolver is by healthchecking services and determining their health status. If the service is healthy, you can query port 8600 on any consul agent (port 8600) and it will provide the list of available servers.
• The healthcheck can be done in a variety of ways, but a particularly nice way of doing it is by having consil execute nagios scripts. There’s also a pure TCP check, a HTTP check and many more

This provides three interesting problems for deployment:

• How do I get my DNS queries to Consul?
• How do I deploy Consul?
• How do I put an infrastructure service in Consul?

Well, I’m going to write about the ways I did this!

## Deploying Consul with Puppet

Consul has an excellent Puppet Module written by @solarkennedy of Yelp which will handle the deploy for you pretty nicely. I found that it wasn’t great at bootstrapping the cluster, but once you have your servers up and running it worked pretty flawlessly!

### Deploying the servers

To deploy the servers with Puppet, create a consul server role and include the puppet module:

The important params here are:

• bootstrap_expect: How large should your server cluster be?
• node_name: Make sure it’s unique, \$::fqdn fact seems reasonable to me
• server: true - make sure it’s a server

Once you’ve deployed this to your three consul hosts, and the service is started, you’ll see something like this in the logs of each server:

What’s happening here is that your cluster is looking for peers, but it can’t find them, so let’s make a cluster. From one of the servers, perform the following command:

and then, in the logs, you’ll see something like this

You have now bootstrapped a consul cluster, and you’re ready to start adding agents to it from the rest of your infrastructure!

### Deploying the agents

As I said earlier, you’ll probably want to deploy the agent to every single host that hosts a service or queries a service. There are other ways to do this, such as not deploying the agent everywhere and changing your DNS servers to resolve to the consul servers, but I chose to do it this way. Your mileage may vary.

Using Puppet, you deploy the agent to every server like so:

The key differences from the servers are:

• the server param is not defined (it’s false by default)
• retry_join is set: this tells the agent to try and retry these servers and therefore rejoin the cluster when it starts up.

Once you’ve deployed this, you’ll have a consul cluster running with agents attached. You can see the status of the cluster like so:

## Consul Services

Now we have our cluster deployed, we need to make it aware of services. There’s a service already deployed for the consul cluster itself, and you can see how it’s deployed and the status of it using a DNS query to the consul agent.

Here, consul has returned the status of the consul service to let me know it’s available from these IP addresses. Consul also supports SRV records, so it can even return the port that it’s listening on

The way it determines what nodes are available to provide a service is using checks which I mentioned earlier. These can be either:

• A script which is executed and returns a nagios compliant code, where 0 is healthy and anything else is an error
• HTTP check which returns a HTTP response code, where anything with 2XX is healthy
• TCP check, basically checking if a port is open.

There are 2 more, TTL and Docker + Interval, but for the sake of this post I’m going to refer you to the documentation for those.

In order for us to get started with a consul service, we need to deploy a check..

## Puppetmaster service

I chose to first deploy a puppetmaster service check, so I’ll use that as my example. Again, I used the puppet module to do this, so in my Puppetmaster role definition, I simple did this:

This defines the service that this node provides and on which port. I now need to define the healthcheck for this service - I used a simple TCP check:

now, when Puppet converges, I should be able to query my service on the Puppetmaster:

Excellent, the service exists and it must be healthy, because there’s a result for the service. Just to confirm this, lets use consul’s http API to query the service status:

### A failing check

Now, this is great at this point, we have a healthy service with a passing healthcheck - but what happens when something breaks. Let’s say a Puppetmaster service is stopped - what exactly happens?

Well, let’s stop our Puppetmaster and see.

Now, let’s do our DNS query again

I’m not getting any dns results from consul. This is basically because I’ve only deployed one Puppetmaster, and I just stopped it from running, but in a multi-node setup, it would return only the healthy nodes. I can confirm this from the consul API again:

Note here how the service is returning critical, so consul has removed it from the DNS query! Easy!

Now if I start it back up, it will of course start serving traffic again and become available in the DNS query:

### DNS resolution

The final piece of this puzzle is to make sure regular DNS traffic can perform these queries. Because consul serves DNS on a non-standard port, we need to figure out how standard DNS queries from applications that expect DNS to always be on port 53 can get in on the action. There are a couple of ways of doing this:

• Have your DNS servers forward queries for the .consul domain to their local agent
• Install a stub resolver or caching resolver on each host which does support port config, like dnsmasq.

In my homelab, I went for option 2, but I would imagine in lots of production environments this wouldn’t really be an options, so forwarding with bind would be a better idea. Your mileage may vary.

#### Configuring DNSmasq

Assuming dnsmasq is installed, you just need a config option in /etc/dnsmasq.d/10-consul like so:

Now, set your resolv.conf to look at localhost first:

And now you can make DNS queries without the port for consul services!

### Puppetmaster Service Deployment

For the final step, you need to do a final thing for your Puppermasters. Because the puppetmaster is now being served on the address puppetmaster.service.home.consul, you’ll need to tweak your puppet config slightly to get things working. First, updated the cert names allowed adding the following to your master’s /etc/puppet/puppet.conf:

Then, clean our the master’s client key (not the CA!) and regenerate a new cert:

At this point, we should be able to run puppet against this new DNS name:

Now, we just need to change the master setting in our puppet.conf, which you can do with Puppet itself of course!

Congratulations, you’ve deployed a service with infrastructure service discovery!

## Wrapping up

What we’ve deployed here only used a single node, but the real benefits should be obvious.

• When we deploy ANY new puppetmaster now, it will use our role definition, and automatically add the service and the healthcheck
• Using whatever deployment automation we use, we should be able to deploy a new service immediately and it will automatically start serving traffic for our infrastructure - no additional config necessary

This article only covers a few of the possibilites with consul. I didn’t cover the key/value store or adding services dynamically using the API. Consul also has first class support for distributed datacenters which wasn’t covered here, which means you can even distribute your services across DC’s and over the WAN.

In my last post, I discussed sensu aggregates and server side checks and how to use them in order to monitor clusters or machines.

I now want to change tack a little bit, and discuss how sensu’s server side checks can be used to monitor remote services in a distributed fashion. It’s often the case that you want to monitor a remote service (AWS VPC availability anyone?) but you don’t want to deploy a specific machine in order to do the monitoring. This is how I used to do monitoring like this - I’d deploy a “monpoller” server which I’d assign checks to and then use sensu’s JIT clients to create the alert.

Well, it turns out, there’s a much better way than this, and it again involves sensu server side checks and something called “roundrobin” subscriptions. Let’s get cracking.

## Roundrobin subscriptions

As mentioned before, you can have sensu clients subscribe to certain checks on a server and these subscriptions can be anything you want. I personally have all sensu clients subscribe to a “base” subscription, and then designate subscriptions based on Puppet facter facts. The brilliant sensu-puppet module allows us to do this easily, and I use hiera to assign these checks to hosts:

I hope these are fairly self explanatory, but in case they aren’t, I’m adding subscriptions to each host based on Facter facts that are either present by default, or I’ve added as custom facts. datacenter and role are custom facts which are company specific, but you can apply subscriptions however you wish.

In addition to these standard subscriptions, I also add a special subscription: roundrobin subscriptions. They look a little bit like this:

Once we’ve assigned these subscriptions, we can use them in a special way with sensu.

## Roundrobin checks

A round robin check is a special server side check in sensu which only executes on a single client.The sensu server takes care of all the tricky stuff for you. It essentially will operate in the same manner as a sensu server side check, the server sends a check request out to the clients on the RabbitMQ queues, but the difference here is that it will only send the check request to a single client, and wait for the response back. This gives you some huge benefits:

• You can monitoring shared resources (NFS shares for example) without having to worry about DDOS’ing yourself
• The check becomes “highly available” pretty quickly. It’s not reliant on a single host like a monpoller host, as the sensu server will pick a client at random with the right subscription
• When compared with the “source” attribute of a sensu check, you can use the JIT client feature and monitor remote resources easily using the advantages of your whole infrastructure.

### Configuring a roundrobin check

Because the roundrobin checks make use of the subscriptions feature, you can only designate them on the server side, and you must have a subscription in place to use them. In Puppet this looks like this:

That’s it! As long as you have a subscription in place for “roundrobin:webservers” - sensu will do all the work for you.

Roundrobin checks are a great addition to your sensu monitoring infrastructure that are grossly underused. I’d highly recommend looking at them and how you can improve your monitoring checks with the server side components as well as the roundrobin checks.